Overall between Jan and Feb it was COLD. A lot colder than I can remember. You'll see below that the HDDs were 1.5x what was last year and 2012. Yikes! And the bill reflects it too. Also note that Duke Energy raise their rates late last year\ too.
Regardless...below are the results:
January 3rd - February 4th, 2013 Bill
Total consumption: 1,050 kWh
Days in billing cycle = 32
Average Daily Consumption = 32.81 kWh/day
Degree days = 606
Consumption per HDD = 1.73 kWh/HDD
Bill = $104.62
January 1st - February 1st, 2014 Bill
Total consumption: 1,438 kWh
Total Solar Generated: 135 kWh (TED5000)
Total Solar back to grid: 29 kWh
Net Consumption: 1,409 kWh
Days in billing cycle = 31
Average Daily Consumption = 45.45 kWh/day (38.52% increase)
Degree days = 906 (149% increase)
Consumption per HDD = 1.56 kWh/HDD (10.24% decrease)
Bill = $145.16
So, while overall we had a huge increase in average daily energy consumption (~39%) compared to last year, factoring in the significantly bitter cold temperatures shows we had an overall 10% reduction in energy usage.
PVWatts | SolarEye | Expected | Actual | ||
Generation | DeRate | Generation | Generation | ||
Month | kWh/mo | % | kWh/mo | kWh/mo | Notes |
1 | 223 | 52% | 116.0 | 135 | TED5000 estimate |
2 | 221 | 72% | 159.1 | 135 | TED5000 estimate |
3 | 282 | 77% | 217.1 | ||
4 | 299 | 83% | 248.2 | ||
5 | 293 | 83% | 243.2 | ||
6 | 277 | 82% | 227.1 | ||
7 | 273 | 82% | 223.9 | ||
8 | 278 | 82% | 228.0 | ||
9 | 254 | 82% | 208.3 | ||
10 | 270 | 75% | 202.5 | ||
11 | 220 | 66% | 145.2 | 96.21 | Energized Nov 7. Fully Online Nov 11. |
12 | 205 | 47% | 96.4 | 99.37 | |
Total | 3095 | 74.8% | 2315 |
FYI, I got January's data from my TED5000 as my Tigo system is not generating data. The Tigo unit says "No Gateway Detected!". The contractor will check out the gateway today to figure out what is going on. Luckily, its not inhibiting me from producing power.
BTW...Tigo makes you PAY to view your own generated data after an apparent "honeymoon" period. This is very annoying as the Tigo website is very sly and not straightforward that a normal homeowner would have to pay. It reads as if only large scale systems need to pay since they would need the advanced features. It's not expensive ($5/year), but it pissed me off regardless. Also the contractor did not tell me of this either which is doubly annoying.
No comments:
Post a Comment